Dianalitics
EverQuote, Inc.
EVER Β· v7 Β· 2026-05-17
hourglass
Loading…
Preparing the latest DD data, styles and content.
check_circleFair value reached Β· +54.46%

Realized +54.46% in 64 days from the tracked date (reference price $17.48). Call closed and archived β€” this report is a historical document, no longer maintained.

81Strong OpportunityDD: May 17, 2026Analyst: 85
paidReference price
USD 17.5 (17/05/2026)
domainMkt cap
$665M
pie_chartShares
36M
candlestick_chart52W
$13.88-$28.73
trending_downShort interest
14.5%
POSITIVENasdaq Global MarketFinancials370 employeesFounded 2008
Verdict: Quality compounder, undervalued vs peers

EverQuote is a high-quality, capital-light insurance marketplace: 15% revenue growth, record adjusted EBITDA, ~53% ROE, zero debt and $178M net cash. It beat guidance across all metrics in Q1 2026. The dominant factor is QUALITY β€” superior returns on capital and a clean balance sheet. On a peer-derived forward EV/EBITDA the stock screens undervalued (~6.7x derived multiple, peer range 7.2–8.5x), with a base-case fair value of ~$27 vs a ~$18.86 price β€” below the analyst consensus of $30–35. The core debate is whether the carrier-spend recovery cycle that drove 2024–25 has more room, or is normalizing toward a slower steady-state; auto-vertical concentration and AI-driven disintermediation of the lead-generation model are the principal risks β€” and the reason short interest has nearly tripled to ~14.5% in a quarter.

πŸ“Š DIANALITICS RESEARCH INDEXCompany & Thesis Assessment Score /100 β€” updated 2026-05-17
85
EverQuote, Inc. (EVER)
Online insurance marketplace / digital advertising Β· NASDAQ Β· Cambridge, MA
"Profitable, cash-rich compounder trading below peer multiples; quality is real, the discount is the opportunity, vertical concentration is the watch-item."
Zero debt Β· $178M cash ROE ~53% 15% revenue growth 90% auto-vertical concentration Cyclical carrier spend AI disintermediation risk
Fin. strength
19
/20 pts
EBITDA/FCF
14
/15 pts
Debt/leverage
15
/15 pts
Stage/business
11
/15 pts
Catalysts
6
/10 pts
Reg. risk
6
/8 pts
Risk/reward
6
/7 pts
Management
4
/5 pts
Sector/macro
2
/3 pts
Compliance
2
/2 pts
πŸ’‘ Fair Value Estimate β€” peer-derived forward EV/EBITDA
Fair value base case
USD 27.0
Range: USD 19.0-USD 35.0
Reference price: USD 17.5 (17/05/2026)
Base upside/downside: +43%

Methodology: Single primary method β€” forward EV/EBITDA β€” with the multiple derived from a peer-median-plus-adjustment grid, not chosen to fit a target. Peer median 8.0x (MediaAlpha 8.0x and NerdWallet 7.2x observed; QuinStreet ~8.5x estimated, TTM 18.8x excluded as distorted). Numeric adjustments net to βˆ’16% (concentration βˆ’21%, margin trend +5%, growth 0%) β†’ 6.7x target. No balance-sheet adjustment to the multiple: with an EV-based multiple, net cash enters as a separate additive line β€” adjusting the multiple for it too would double-count. The FY26E EBITDA of ~$115M is an estimate (Q1 actual + Q2 guidance + Q3–Q4 run-rate extrapolation), not company guidance. AI growth-solutions optionality is excluded from the base case β€” no defensible NPV basis β€” and reflected only in the Bull scenario. The table sums arithmetically: 21.40 + 4.96 + 0.80 = $27.16. The derived 6.7x matches the forward EV/EBITDA independently reported for EVER by third-party sources. Scenario weights (25/50/25) follow the QUALITY profile β€” stable earnings justify a tight distribution; the bear case is floored by net cash. Sensitivity: a Β±1x change in the multiple moves FV by ~Β±$3.2/sh; a Β±$10M change in FY26E EBITDA moves FV by ~Β±$1.9/sh. Note: earlier drafts used assumed peer multiples of 13–17x and a reverse-engineered 5x β€” both corrected here against actual forward peer data. ⚠️ Not investment advice.

ComponentAssumptionUSD/share
Core marketplace value (EV)~$115M FY26E adj. EBITDA (estimate) Γ— 6.7x derived EV/EBITDA = $770M EV / 36M sh+21.40
Net cash floor$178.5M cash βˆ’ $0 debt = $178.5M / 36M sh+4.96
Buyback accretion$50M program, ~$30M remaining at <$20/sh, reduces share count ~4%+0.80
FV base case21.40 + 4.96 + 0.80 = 27.16, roundedβ‰ˆ $27.00
Bull
$31–35
Probability: 25%
Carrier spend reaccelerates, home/renters scales toward 15%+ of revenue, concentration discount narrows, multiple re-rates to ~8.5x peer top. AI growth-solutions begins to monetize β€” the optionality excluded from the base case.
Base
$24–29
Probability: 50%
Revenue growth normalizes to mid-teens, margins hold ~15%. Derived 6.7x multiple holds. Steady compounding; stock closes the gap to fair value.
Bear
$18–22
Probability: 25%
Auto-insurance ad cycle rolls over (as in 2022–23), carrier budgets contract, growth turns negative. Multiple compresses to ~5.5x; net cash (~$5/sh) provides the floor.
Methodology: Methodology: Single primary method β€” forward EV/EBITDA β€” with the multiple derived from a peer-median-plus-adjustment grid, not chosen to fit a target. Peer median 8.0x (MediaAlpha 8.0x and NerdWallet 7.2x observed; QuinStreet ~8.5x estimated, TTM 18.8x excluded as distorted). Numeric adjustments net to βˆ’16% (concentration βˆ’21%, margin trend +5%, growth 0%) β†’ 6.7x target. No balance-sheet adjustment to the multiple: with an EV-based multiple, net cash enters as a separate additive line β€” adjusting the multiple for it too would double-count. The FY26E EBITDA of ~$115M is an estimate (Q1 actual + Q2 guidance + Q3–Q4 run-rate extrapolation), not company guidance. AI growth-solutions optionality is excluded from the base case β€” no defensible NPV basis β€” and reflected only in the Bull scenario. The table sums arithmetically: 21.40 + 4.96 + 0.80 = $27.16. The derived 6.7x matches the forward EV/EBITDA independently reported for EVER by third-party sources. Scenario weights (25/50/25) follow the QUALITY profile β€” stable earnings justify a tight distribution; the bear case is floored by net cash. Sensitivity: a Β±1x change in the multiple moves FV by ~Β±$3.2/sh; a Β±$10M change in FY26E EBITDA moves FV by ~Β±$1.9/sh. Note: earlier drafts used assumed peer multiples of 13–17x and a reverse-engineered 5x β€” both corrected here against actual forward peer data. ⚠️ Not investment advice. Not investment advice.
check_circle
βœ… Dominant factor: QUALITY
ROE ~53% (well above the >15% threshold), net cash position (net debt/EBITDA strongly negative, vs <2x threshold), and adjusted EBITDA margin expanding from 13.5% to 15.4% YoY β€” margins stable-to-rising. QUALITY criteria are fully met. VALUE is also largely met as a secondary factor: forward P/E is ~7–8x and the peer-derived EV/EBITDA points to ~43% upside β€” the stock is genuinely cheap, not just mid-range (P/B is high, but that is normal for a capital-light, asset-light marketplace and not a meaningful value signal here). MOMENTUM fails the key test: the price is ~34% below the 52-week high (~$28.7) and down ~29% over 12 months, despite recent earnings beats and stable estimates. QUALITY is dominant; VALUE is a genuine supporting factor; MOMENTUM is absent.
πŸ“Š Capital Structure Β· Short Interest Β· Buyback & Dilution
🟑 Short Interest
~14.5%
~5.24M shares short on ~36M outstanding. Nearly tripled in a quarter: 8.7% (Jan) β†’ ~14.5% (latest). The rise tracks the Insurify AI scare and the cyclical-peak thesis, not financial distress.
🟑 Share dilution (1Y)
+3.0%
~35M β†’ ~36M shares. Cause: stock-based compensation. Partly offset by the active buyback program.
🟒 Buyback
$50M
Inaugural $50M program through July 2026. ~1.1M shares (~$19.9M) repurchased in Q1 2026; ~$21M earlier from Link Ventures.
Short Interest β€” context
EVER β€” 14.5%
14.5%

Short interest of ~14.5% sits at the top of the "elevated" band (above 10% is high; 20%+ would be severe). The notable feature is its speed: it rose from 8.7% in January to ~14.5% in roughly a quarter, with a sharp jump in February when competitor Insurify launched an AI shopping tool and the stock fell ~11% in one session. The short thesis is not about balance-sheet quality β€” that is clearly strong β€” but about the durability of current earnings: shorts are betting either that 2024–25 is a cyclical peak (revenue quadrupled off a depressed 2023 base) or that AI-driven disintermediation erodes the lead-generation model. This is the measurable version of the same scepticism shown by the share price, down ~29% over 12 months despite rising earnings. Days-to-cover is ~5 β€” no explosive squeeze setup. Insider activity: SEC filings over 12 months show numerous small insider sells and zero buys β€” routine for a stock-comp-heavy company, but no buy-side conviction signal. Link Ventures (Chairman David Blundin) remains the largest holder with ~19% ownership and majority voting power.

$Financial analysis β€” FY2026
Revenue (Q1 2026)
$190.9M
+15% YoY Β· beat guidance high end
Adj. EBITDA (Q1 2026)
$29.3M
+30% YoY Β· record Β· 15.4% margin
Cash / Debt
$178.5M
Zero debt Β· net cash position
ROE (TTM)
~53%
Capital-light Β· high return on capital
ItemFY2023FY2024FY2025Q1 2026Guidance Q2 2026
Revenue$288M$501M$692.5M$190.9M$185–195M (~21% mid)
Adj. EBITDA~$3M~$61M~$97M$29.3M$28–30M (~32% mid)
GAAP net income~βˆ’$50M~$26M$99.3M*$18.7MN/D β€” not guided
Operating cash flowlow~$50M$95.4M$29.6MN/D β€” not guided
Variable Marketing $N/D~$160M~$200M$55.9M$55–57M (~23% mid)
*FY2025 GAAP net income includes a large deferred-tax benefit (~$38M positive tax item in Q4 2025), which inflates the headline figure and the TTM ROE. Adjusted EBITDA is the cleaner profitability measure. FY2023 was depressed by the auto-insurance ad downturn.
Quarterly dynamics β€” last 5 quarters
MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025Q4 2025Q1 2026
Revenue ($M)166.6156.6~166195.3190.9
Adj. EBITDA ($M)22.522.025.125.129.3
Net income ($M)8.014.718.957.818.7
Cash EOP ($M)~125148.2~165~170178.5
Q4 2025 net income of $57.8M is boosted by a one-off tax benefit. Adjusted EBITDA shows the clean trend: steady sequential growth to a record $29.3M in Q1 2026. Cash builds every quarter despite buybacks.
Financial position and sustainability
Balance sheet β€” net cash
$178.5M
Adj. EBITDA margin (Q1 2026)
15.4%
Auto-vertical revenue concentration
~90%
Revenue growth (Q1 2026 YoY)
+15%
account_tree

Business model β€” insurance lead-generation marketplace

Capital-light, data-driven marketplace
EverQuote operates an online marketplace that connects consumers shopping for insurance with carriers and agents. Revenue is generated per validated, high-intent consumer referral. The model is asset-light: no underwriting risk, no claims exposure. Key levers are Variable Marketing Dollars (VMD = revenue minus advertising spend) and Variable Marketing Margin. Growth depends heavily on carrier marketing budgets, which are cyclical: when carriers are profitable they spend aggressively on customer acquisition; when underwriting losses rise (as in 2021–23) they cut sharply.

Automotive insurance ~$172M Q1'26 (~90% rev) 🟒 ramping Core vertical, +13% YoY. Driven by major auto carriers re-entering growth mode after the 2021–23 downturn. The engine of the business β€” and its single biggest concentration risk. Home & renters insurance ~$18.5M Q1'26 (~10% rev) 🟒 ramping Fastest-growing segment, +33% YoY. Strategic diversification away from auto. Still small but the key lever to reduce cyclicality if it scales. AI & growth solutions embedded / not broken out 🟑 to be proven Management is reframing EVER as a "growth solutions partner" with AI integrated into matching and operations. Optionality, not yet a separate revenue line.

Long-term ambition
Management reiterates a path to $1B in annual revenue within 2–3 years, stated as purely organic with no M&A required. Track record supports credibility: ~4x revenue growth and >$100M of annualized adjusted EBITDA expansion over 7 years.
gavel

Legal, regulatory and risk analysis

Auto-vertical concentration
High
~90% of revenue from the automotive insurance vertical. Any structural slowdown in auto-carrier ad spend hits the whole business with little offset.
Carrier-spend cyclicality
High
Demand is tied to insurers' underwriting profitability. The 2021–23 downturn cut revenue hard. The 2024–25 boom is partly a recovery cycle that can normalize or reverse.
Customer concentration
Moderate
A handful of large carriers drive a significant share of revenue. Loss or budget cut from one major partner would be material.
AI disintermediation
High
Competitor Insurify's AI shopping tool triggered an ~11% one-day drop in Feb 2026. AI-driven matching could erode the value of a lead-generation marketplace β€” the asset-light model that is a strength is also easy to bypass. Structural, not cyclical, and the main driver of the recent short-interest spike.
Valuation / multiple compression
Moderate
Trades below the peer-derived fair value and below the peer EV/EBITDA range. The risk is not overvaluation but ~14.5% short interest: a growth miss could still trigger a sharp de-rating despite the valuation cushion.
Litigation / governance
Low
No active class action, short-seller report or SEC investigation surfaced in searches. Controlled-company structure (Link Ventures majority voting) limits minority-holder influence.
Balance sheet strength
Positive
$178.5M cash, zero debt, strong operating cash flow. No refinancing risk, no covenants, full strategic flexibility β€” a genuine quality anchor.
Profitability & cash generation
Positive
Record adjusted EBITDA, ~15% margin and expanding, ~53% ROE, consistent guidance beats. Capital-light model converts growth into cash efficiently.
Diversification optionality
Positive
Home & renters growing 33% YoY; if it scales it structurally reduces auto cyclicality. AI initiatives add further upside optionality.
article

SWOT analysis

Strengths
  • +Zero debt, $178.5M net cash, strong free cash flow
  • +~53% ROE β€” capital-light, high return on capital
  • +Record adjusted EBITDA, margin expanding 13.5% β†’ 15.4%
  • +Consistent guidance beats; credible 7-year execution track record
  • +Active $50M buyback partly offsetting stock-comp dilution
Weaknesses
  • βˆ’~90% revenue concentration in the auto-insurance vertical
  • βˆ’Revenue inherently cyclical, tied to carrier ad budgets
  • βˆ’No insider buying; controlled-company governance structure
  • βˆ’FY2025 headline net income flattered by one-off tax benefit
Opportunities
  • β†’Home & renters vertical scaling at 33% YoY β€” diversification
  • β†’Organic path to $1B revenue in 2–3 years, no M&A needed
  • β†’AI integration in matching/operations as efficiency lever
  • β†’Re-rating potential if growth proves structural, not cyclical
Threats
  • !AI disintermediation of lead-gen (Insurify scare, Feb 2026)
  • !Reversal of the auto-insurance ad cycle (2021–23 precedent)
  • !Short interest ~14.5%, nearly tripled in a quarter
  • !Stock down ~29% over 12 months despite rising earnings
article

Summary by assessment area

🟒 Financial risk β€” LOW
  • Zero debt, $178.5M cash, strong cash conversion
  • Record adjusted EBITDA, ~15% margin and rising
  • ~53% ROE β€” clear QUALITY signal
🟑 Business risk β€” MODERATE
  • ~90% auto-vertical concentration
  • Revenue cyclical, dependent on carrier budgets
  • Diversification underway but still early
🟒 Valuation / R-R β€” FAVORABLE
  • FV ~$27 vs price ~$18.86 β€” material upside (~43%)
  • 6.7x derived multiple, below 7.2–8.5x peer range (concentration discount)
  • Base case modestly below analyst consensus ($30–35)
Sources & Disclaimer

Sources: EverQuote 8-K and 10-Q filings for Q1 2026 and FY2025 (SEC EDGAR); Q1 2026 earnings press release and call transcript (May 4, 2026); company investor materials. Market data (2026-05-17, last close 2026-05-14, verified across TradingView and Kraken): EVER ~$18.86, market cap ~$665M, 52-week range ~$13.88–$28.73, ~36M shares outstanding. Short interest ~14.5% of shares outstanding (~5.24M shares, NASDAQ/StockAnalysis). Analyst consensus average target ~$30–35 (May 2026, range $23–40), notably above current price. Peer multiples (MediaAlpha, QuinStreet, NerdWallet) are approximate, based on publicly reported figures. This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice.