Dianalitics
Karat Packaging
KRT · v2 · 2026-10-30
hourglass
Loading…
Preparing the latest DD data, styles and content.
46NeutralDD: Oct 30, 2026Analyst: 61
paidPrice at analysis date
USD 54.4 (30/10/2026)
domainMkt cap
-
pie_chartShares
19.7095m
candlestick_chart52W
$20.61-$56.06
trending_downShort interest
8.11%
MEDIUMMaterials
Verdict: Cautious

Karat has real demand growth and a growing online channel, but the spectacular Q2 profit was flattered by a one-time tariff refund. At the October 29 share price, normalized earnings carry a demanding valuation. The next quarter is the test: can sales momentum survive while gross and EBITDA margins return to ordinary levels?

📊 DIANALITICS RESEARCH INDEXScore /100 — updated 2026-10-30
61
Karat Packaging (KRT)
Consumer Discretionary · Nasdaq
Strong revenue momentum, but normalized earnings do not support the current price.
Revenue growthTariff refund distortionValuation risk
Fin. strength
13
/20 pts
EBITDA/FCF
7
/15 pts
Debt/leverage
12
/15 pts
Stage/business
13
/15 pts
Catalysts
5
/10 pts
Reg. risk
4
/8 pts
Risk/reward
1
/7 pts
Management
3
/5 pts
Sector/macro
2
/3 pts
Compliance
1
/2 pts
Fair value
Fair value base case
USD 25.5
Range: USD 19.2-USD 35.3
Price at analysis date: USD 54.4 (30/10/2026)
Base upside/downside: -53%

Method: $52m analyst normalized EBITDA × peer-median 9.3x EV/EBITDA + $19.5m June net cash, divided by 19.7095m shares. The Q2 IEEPA refund is excluded.

ComponentAssumptionUSD/share
2026 normalized sales2025 $467.7m; company guides low-double-digit growth; analyst estimate $520m—
Normalized EBITDA10% analyst margin, consistent with Q3 guidance 9–11%; excludes $25.8m Q2 tariff benefit—
Enterprise value$52m × 9.3x; median of observed GPK 7.5x, REYN 9.31x and PKG 13.2x EV/EBITDA; no adjustment$24.54
Net cashJune cash/investments $54.143m less $34.648m debt; September maturity requires Q3 verification$0.99
Base equity($483.6m + $19.5m) / 19.7095m shares$25.53
SensitivityEach 1x EBITDA multiple moves value about $2.64/share±$2.64
Bull
$35.29
Probability: 20%
13.0x normalized EBITDA if growth and margins sustain.
Base
$25.53
Probability: 50%
9.3x peer-median EBITDA at a 10% normalized margin.
Bear
$19.19
Probability: 30%
6.9x EBITDA if tariffs and cost pressure persist.
Methodology: Method: $52m analyst normalized EBITDA × peer-median 9.3x EV/EBITDA + $19.5m June net cash, divided by 19.7095m shares. The Q2 IEEPA refund is excluded. Not investment advice.

Capital structure

Equity market value
~$1.072bn
$54.39 × 19.7095m shares
52-week trading range
$20.61–$56.06
October 29 close is 3.0% below the high
June liquidity
$54.1m
$38.4m cash + $15.7m short-term investments

Short interest: 689,226 shares, 8.11% of float as of 2026-10-15. Buyback: $15m authorization, $3.0m repurchased in 2025 and $2.0m in H1 2026. Share count change requires Q3 verification.

Short interest 8.11%

Financial performance: look through the refund

The number that changes the story
Q2 2026 sales rose 9.9% to a record $136.3m. Reported adjusted EBITDA jumped to $41.6m, but $25.8m came from an IEEPA tariff refund. Without that contribution, adjusted EBITDA was about $15.8m, an 11.6% margin, versus reported 30.5%. That is the earnings base an investor should examine.
Q2 sales growth
+9.9%
Q2 EBITDA ex-refund
$15.8m
H1 free cash flow
$38.1m
H1 FCF ex-refund receipts
~$12.9m
USD millionFY2024FY2025H1 2025H1 2026
Revenue422.6467.7227.6253.2
Operating income37.841.424.446.1 incl. $25.8m refund
Adjusted EBITDAN/DN/D29.654.1 incl. $25.8m refund
Operating cash flow48.033.817.540.3 incl. $25.2m cash refund
Free cash flowN/DN/D16.238.1 incl. $25.2m cash refund
USD millionQ3 2025Q4 2025Q1 2026Q2 2026
Sales124.5115.6116.9136.3
H1 2026 revenue growth
11.3%

Q2 adjusted EBITDA $41.6m included $25.8m in tariff refunds; excluding that item yields about $15.8m. Q3 guidance is 9–11% adjusted EBITDA margin. H1 cash flow included $25.2m refund receipts.

The company defines free cash flow as operating cash flow less purchases of property and equipment and related deposits. H1 FCF was $38.1m, but stripping out $25.2m of tariff-refund cash receipts leaves an analytical $12.9m. This is not company-reported adjusted FCF; it is a simple cash normalization. H1 dividends of $18.0m exceeded that normalized amount, so the distribution depends on a stronger second half or the balance sheet. Q2 10-Q cash-flow reconciliation

Management guides Q3 sales growth in the low double digits, gross margin of 35–37%, and adjusted EBITDA margin of 9–11%, with insignificant further tariff refunds. For FY2026 it expects low-double-digit sales growth; the full-year mid-teens EBITDA margin includes the H1 refund and therefore should not be mistaken for the recurring run rate. Q2 results and guidance

The margin bridge matters: Q2 import costs rose to 11.1% of sales from 9.5% a year earlier. Shipping and transportation expense increased $3.1m, platform fees $0.6m and marketing $0.5m. Sales volume is growing, yet serving that growth is more expensive; stronger revenue alone does not ensure higher per-share value. Management discussion

article

Business model: a growing channel, an import-heavy engine

Foodservice packaging distribution
Karat sells cups, containers, bags, cutlery and other foodservice supplies to restaurant chains, distributors, online buyers and retailers. In H1 2026, chains and distributors generated $198.8m of sales, online $45.3m and retail $9.1m. The online channel grew 23.6% in Q2; retail shrank. Investors are buying a distribution and sourcing platform with some manufacturing, not a pure sustainability brand.

The most tangible growth proof is customer acquisition: management said it added four chain accounts in Q2. In the 2025 annual report it described a paper-bag contract with expected annualized revenue of about $17m. That contract is meaningful against FY2025 revenue of $467.7m, but it is a forecast of customer demand, not revenue already earned. 2025 annual report

Karat Earth products accounted for 34.1% of FY2025 sales, up modestly from 33.6% in FY2024, and the eco-friendly catalog exceeded 580 SKUs. The opportunity is wider adoption by large chains; the limitation is that an expanding catalog does not by itself prove pricing power or better margins. 2025 annual report

The supply chain carries a clear trade-off. China sourcing fell from about 22% of purchases in 2024 to 15% in 2025; Taiwan remained about 50%, while Malaysia and Vietnam together rose to about 17% from 9%. Diversification helps with tariffs, yet import costs and freight still flow directly into gross margin. A planned 47,000-square-foot Orlando distribution center could improve service in the Southeast; its opening and unit economics need confirmation in later filings. 2025 10-K

article

What could break the thesis

Refund illusion
High
The $25.8m Q2 EBITDA benefit reverses tariffs paid earlier. Extrapolating reported Q2 earnings into 2027 would overstate recurring earning power.
Import and trade costs
High
Q2 import costs reached 11.1% of sales, up from 9.5%. New duties, resin prices or ocean freight could erase volume-led growth.
Q3 margin reset
High
Management itself guides 9–11% Q3 adjusted EBITDA margin versus the refund-inflated 30.5% Q2 print. A miss below 9% would weaken the normalized model.
Valuation compression
High
The $54.39 price implies roughly 20.3x a $52m normalized EBITDA estimate after net cash; a 9.3x peer median yields a much lower equity value.
Cash conversion and dividends
Moderate
H1 FCF excluding refund receipts is about $12.9m, below $18.0m of dividends paid. Working-capital or freight pressure could narrow coverage.
Customs case
Moderate
The CBP thermal-paper duty investigation led to $1.9m paid in 2025 and $0.2m in H1 2026; a $1.3m reserve remained at June 30 and final payments may vary.
Execution on expansion
Moderate
Four new chain accounts and the Orlando center need profitable fulfillment, not just sales growth; warehouse and platform costs already rose.
Thin public float
Moderate
689,226 shares were sold short, 8.11% of float as of October 15. A concentrated float can amplify moves around earnings in either direction.

The customs matter is disclosed in the June 2026 10-Q. It is separate from the IEEPA tariff refund and should not be netted against it mechanically. 10-Q contingencies

article

SWOT

Strengths
  • +Growing online channel
  • +Profitable operations
  • +Diversified products
  • +Positive operating cash
Weaknesses
  • −Refund-distorted quarter
  • −Lower 2025 cash conversion
  • −Tariff sensitivity
  • −Limited valuation cushion
Opportunities
  • →Orlando distribution
  • →Paper bag expansion
  • →Chain penetration
  • →Logistics efficiency
Threats
  • !Tariff reversals
  • !Input inflation
  • !Margin compression
  • !Multiple derating
article

Investment case in three questions

What is working?
  • Revenue has grown for two years, online sales are accelerating, and four new chain accounts add a route to future volume. The product mix includes a real, if slowly expanding, eco-friendly line.
What is priced in?
  • At $54.39, investors are paying for a much richer normalized EBITDA multiple than the 9.3x median of the three broad packaging peers cited above. The one-time tariff refund cannot support that premium.
What changes the call?
  • The next published quarter should show Q3 revenue growth, 35–37% gross margin and 9–11% adjusted EBITDA margin without material refund help. Durable cash conversion and profitable Orlando expansion would strengthen the case; a margin miss would weaken it.

Key monitoring rule: compare new results with the company’s refund-free Q3 guidance, not with its unusually strong reported Q2 margin. This report estimates base fair value at $25.53; the gap is large because the valuation removes a nonrecurring profit boost and uses a peer-derived multiple. The price can remain above that estimate if the market expects higher durable growth, which the next results must substantiate.

Sources & Disclaimer

Primary sources: Q2 2026 release and guidance · June 2026 10-Q · 2025 10-K · 2025 annual report · Price: 2026-10-29 close $54.39, cross-checked against MarketMinute and TGMCharts. Peer multiples are broad-industry observations with limited comparability. Analyst estimates and derived normalizations are identified in the text. ⚠️ Not investment advice.